At the heart of underwriter insights - Cyber
Underwriter Team Lead, Cyber
From a cyber underwriting perspective, construction is highly exposed to operational disruption and financial loss. In Canada, the sector’s rapid adoption of interconnected IT systems, operational technology, third‑party platforms and supply chains which are often spread across multiple active sites and regions creates complexity that can be exploited. A single cyber incident can stall projects, restrict access to critical systems and ripple through contractors and suppliers, resulting in delays, cost overruns, liquidated damages and lost revenue and reputation.
This exposure is growing as cyber risk is increasingly viewed through the lens of operational resilience. Canadian firms are facing rising expectations from clients, lenders, and public‑sector counterparties around their ability to continue operations through disruption. While regulation is less prescriptive than in some European markets, guidance from federal bodies such as the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security and evolving requirements tied to critical infrastructure, public procurement and cross‑border operations are raising the baseline for cyber resilience. For many construction businesses, demonstrating resilience is becoming essential to securing work, particularly on large or infrastructure‑linked projects.
Cyber incidents are also reflecting this shift. Losses are less about data theft alone and more about downtime - systems locked by ransomware, workflows interrupted and, in some cases, physical operations affected through connected building systems or industrial controls. The distinction between cyber risk and business interruption has effectively disappeared.
Notably, many serious losses still stem from relatively basic issues: identity & access management, legacy systems that cannot be easily patched, trusted third‑party access, and social engineering. Addressing these fundamental cyber risks can significantly reduce both the severity and duration of disruptions.
Beyond prevention, response capability is critical. The speed at which a firm can contain an incident, make decisions, and restore operations has a direct impact on project disruption and financial loss. Tested incident response plans, clear governance and realistic recovery assumptions are therefore key underwriting considerations.
For brokers and underwriters, conversations are increasingly centered on tangible outcomes rather than abstract threats: how long operations could be down, which projects would be affected, and how quickly work could resume. Ultimately, in the Canadian construction market, cyber risk and operational interruption are inseparable.
At the heart of underwriter insights - Cyber
Underwriter Team Lead, Cyber
From a cyber underwriting perspective, construction is highly exposed to operational disruption and financial loss. In Canada, the sector’s rapid adoption of interconnected IT systems, operational technology, third‑party platforms and supply chains which are often spread across multiple active sites and regions creates complexity that can be exploited. A single cyber incident can stall projects, restrict access to critical systems and ripple through contractors and suppliers, resulting in delays, cost overruns, liquidated damages and lost revenue and reputation.
This exposure is growing as cyber risk is increasingly viewed through the lens of operational resilience. Canadian firms are facing rising expectations from clients, lenders, and public‑sector counterparties around their ability to continue operations through disruption. While regulation is less prescriptive than in some European markets, guidance from federal bodies such as the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security and evolving requirements tied to critical infrastructure, public procurement and cross‑border operations are raising the baseline for cyber resilience. For many construction businesses, demonstrating resilience is becoming essential to securing work, particularly on large or infrastructure‑linked projects.
Cyber incidents are also reflecting this shift. Losses are less about data theft alone and more about downtime - systems locked by ransomware, workflows interrupted and, in some cases, physical operations affected through connected building systems or industrial controls. The distinction between cyber risk and business interruption has effectively disappeared.
Notably, many serious losses still stem from relatively basic issues: identity & access management, legacy systems that cannot be easily patched, trusted third‑party access, and social engineering. Addressing these fundamental cyber risks can significantly reduce both the severity and duration of disruptions.
Beyond prevention, response capability is critical. The speed at which a firm can contain an incident, make decisions, and restore operations has a direct impact on project disruption and financial loss. Tested incident response plans, clear governance and realistic recovery assumptions are therefore key underwriting considerations.
For brokers and underwriters, conversations are increasingly centered on tangible outcomes rather than abstract threats: how long operations could be down, which projects would be affected, and how quickly work could resume. Ultimately, in the Canadian construction market, cyber risk and operational interruption are inseparable.
Article